YOU'RE:// FAD / BLOG / ARCHIVE / CATEGORY / seventeen

Archive for the 'seventeen' Category

WE LIKE WHAT YOU EAT at Seventeen Gallery

Thursday, April 17th, 2008

we-like-what-you-eat.gif

WE LIKE WHAT YOU EATWEDNESDAY 16TH APR - SATURDAY 17TH MAY 2008

PRIVATE VIEW - Thursday 17th Apr 

WE LIKE WHAT YOU EAT is a micro survey exhibition investigating a specific set of tendencies in the practice of a selected group of North American contemporary video artists.The appropriation of pre-existing mainstream entertainment media is the dominant refrain in the work of the artists featured in this exhibition. The internet, in particular video streaming websites such as YouTube, as well as television programs, advertisements, music videos and cinema serve Paul B. Davis, the duo Javier Morales + John Michael Boling and Eric Fensler with an abundant territory from which they draw both their inspiration and subject matter.

In terms of exposure, the art gallery has been matched and perhaps even surpassed in importance by the website itself as an artistic platform for the included artists. In exact accordance with this relocation, there is no singular or predictable audience for their work and that of its ilk; from high school computer geeks to international curators - the fascinated take no dogmatic form.Immediate, humorous, inventive and, above all, relevant - the artists in WE LIKE WHAT YOU EAT stand as the selected representatives of a much larger movement which, while having an international span, nonetheless maintains its spiritual centre in the United States of America……….

Paul B. Davis [BEIGE] is a DJ, educator and data artist as well as being a founder member, alongside Cory Archangel, of the programming ensemble BEIGE. He had his first solo show at SEVENTEEN in 2007 and will present a solo booth at the SEVENTEEN stand at the NEXT Art Fair in Chicago, April 2008. He presents one of his trademark YouTube hacks - glitchy, pixilated visual mash-up's constructed via the manipulation of the compositional data contained within a number of standard video clips taken from the websiteJavier Morales + John Michael Boling first collaborated together as fellow students at the University of Georgia. Their collective oeuvre is here represented by two key video collaborations, The Church of The Future (2006) and Body Magic (2006); both television re-edit works that are mystical, musical and indeterminately potent.

Together Morales and Boling run the website 53 o's (http://www.gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com/channel53/) and program the video blog Channel 53. Eric Fensler's diverse creative output is beyond singular classification - comprising television re-edits, cartoon re-cuts/re-voicings, Polaroid photography, music videos and network television screen writing. For the exhibition he presents a number of video works including the much lauded GI JOE PSA series - manipulated versions of the public service announcements that accompanied the end of each episode of the cult toy franchise's popular children's television cartoon. A series of evening screenings of related video material from each of the artists will accompany this exhibition. Please contact the gallery for more information regarding these events and the exhibition in general ……….WE LIKE WHAT YOU EAT is the inaugural exhibition at SEVENTEEN's new basement exhibition space - curated by Paul Pieroni.

In late May SEVENTEEN will follow this exhibition with the first major survey of the British Scratch Video phenomenon (1983/6). SCRATCH! will run from the 28/05/08 to the 25/06/08. 

And dont forget this Private view tonight

Thursday, April 12th, 2007

graham-hudson-when-its-windy-2006.gif

It was the best of Time Outs, it was the worst of Time Outs

Peter Davies David Ersser Graham Hudson
SEVENTEEN
18th April - 19th May 2007
PV Thursday 19th April 6pm
This exhibition has little to do with the French Revolution or the Dickensian ability for timeless gems on society, more an ability to tap the over-familiar, the clich of signs, art objects, and expectations. None of the three artists place text at the centre of their practice, the recurrence of the written word is as a visual motif, alongside paint, wood, and tape. Here language communicates, contradicts, and refuses to be pinned down.
Peter Davies is known for his use of text in the form of lists and flow charts, but in his two new paintings, Davies juxtaposes imagery with his lettering. Replacing the familiar artists names and related response, seen in previous text works, the new paintings combine a comment with a figurative image, all made with the visual care and consideration of his earlier abstract paintings.
The texts and images are comic and aggressive, and continue Davies interest in combining the wit of conceptualism with the beauty of formalism, now with the added ingredient of the clich of expressionism.
They lead on directly from the recent series of "angry" text paintings such as Why is British Art So Crap, 2006 and Whats all the Fuss About, 2006. The new paintings are influenced by the likes of Ed Ruscha, Barbara Kruger and the Guerilla Girls, or Sister Corita but are emptied of issues or things to protest about.
Graham Hudson presents his self-defeating outdoor sculpture When its windy this sculpture falls over, 2006. This work operates in a tautological, self-annulling system, which seems entirely obvious and yet inescapable. Its a monument to Kafka-esque Health & Safety, as its the attention given to alerting the viewer with an excess of warning tape, that provides the large surface area needed to ensure its predicted downfall. Like a Shakespearian tragic hero it is the exact same traits that en-noble the piece, that are its ultimate undoing. Nevertheless as the work is now presented indoors, an artefact to the windy conditions it was originally made in, the viewer is enabled to engage Hudsons proposition in the context of a formal art object.
David Ersser provides a new work for the show; a two metre square neon sign that demands I need sexual healing in solid capitals. The style of font, the domineering scale of the sign and the showy, decorative bands surrounding the text suggest the manner of a bar window. It would be an excessively flashy, kitsch, dazzling affair if the object hadnt been carved and teased out of balsa wood rather than the usual neon gas filled glass tubing. The disappointment is palpable.
What would have been an exciting, warm glow is replaced by a cold sterility, at odds with the content of the text. Devoid of light and the hum of neon, this is an empty, pathetic statement, a uselessly intricate simulation. Erssers work speaks of the entropy of late-capitalist production, and questions the role of the artist as supposed hero and guiding voice to society.
Graham Hudson,When its Windy, 2006 collection & courtesy of Rokeby, London. Graham Hudson is represented by Rokeby.

Shay Kun @ Seventeen

Monday, January 29th, 2007

shay-kun2.jpg

Shay Kun Outburst, 2006 acrylic and oil paint on canvas 36 x 48 in

PV Thursday Feb 1st 6pm

This series of landscape paintings by Shay Kun draws heavily on a very specific historic period and location, namely the Hudson River School of the 19th century. Kun’s landscapes particularly reference Thomas Cole’s (1801-1848) reverent paeans to nature and Albert Bierstadt’s (1830-1902) towering Yosemite cliff faces, awestruck visions of the sublime in the American West. Both artists focused on idealized pastoral landscapes, whose romanticism is evident in the synthetic composition, and held values that were rapidly dismissed and out of fashion even in their own lifetime.

Kun’s works, however, denote their cultural position with the addition of interlopers in the scenery. Applied in acrylic as opposed to the oil background, the inserts are not only out of place and out of scale, but they are moreover out of context, geographically and/or socially.

Pristine vistas are blighted by tightropes, flagpoles, killer-whales and evidence of contemporary human presence; battleships, estate cars and frogmen. The contrast between these contemporary figures and their stylized and specifically dated environment is abrupt, but despite this, they’re an almost offensively inadequate substitute for the deities or characters of noble bearing that filled their place in painting of the past centuries. The cut and paste figures seem oddly pathetic, and while their jarring absurdity echoes the Knights and maidens in Thomas Cole’s Gothic fantasies The Departure, 1837 and The Return, 1837, their modernity somehow fails to match their romanticized predecessors’ august and worthy outlook.

The works, however, remain open-ended as Kun’s almost contradictory decision to paint the landscapes himself rather than appropriate or collage onto existing images, implies a degree of sincerity and even a celebration of the Hudson Valley School.

If this much love, labour and effort is employed in the production of these landscapes, perhaps the re-presentation of these aesthetics might be justified beyond any ironic nod to the fickle cycles of art history.

Shay Kun lives and works in New York.

SEARCH:
image
ADVERTISING
blog search directory
LondonArt, Be inspired
Visit Art.com
Fine Art for Sale
NewsNow